[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071008002917.GB28926@deepthought>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:29:17 +0100
From: Ken Moffat <ken@...uxfromscratch.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: syntax highlighting, emacs ([PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2))
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:11:21AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> Actually, blue is perceived as one of the darkest colors by the human
> eye. There is a reason that the RGB -> grayscale transformation uses
> the following weighting: r=76 g=154 b=26.
But, not every video card reproduces blue in the same way, let
alone every monitor - somewhere I've got an old CRT monitor where
blue text was mostly unreadable (_too_dark_). For photo-editing,
I now use xgamma to get adequately-consistent results on whichever of
4 machines I'm using (one LCD monitor, with KVM switch) - the
settings for the individual machines are very different.
And, of course, people have different colour vision (and unless we
are labelled as colour-blind, we each regard our colour vision as
"normal"). So, what is perfectly acceptable for you on specific
hardware may be totally unusable for someone else.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists