[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1985e0f60710080734y4897a8e1ke253b6d4273146ec@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:04:24 +0530
From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinuxrt@...il.com>
To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc9-rt2
Hi Steve,
On 10/8/07, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> --
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
>
> > Do you have any plans to support nested or reentrant Interrupt Handling schemes.
> >
>
> Hi Jaswinder,
>
> Not sure what you mean by this, since interrupt handlers are run as
> threads and are fully preemptible.
>
I think by nested or reentrant interrupt handling technique you can
further reduce latencies.
what you think.
Can we can get guaranteed realtime throughput by using these realtime patch.
Thank you,
Jaswinder SIngh.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists