linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/5] RT - Track which CPUs should get IPI'd on rt-overload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071009142610.4941.90103.stgit@novell1.haskins.net>
Date:	Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:26:10 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc:	kravetz@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ghaskins@...ell.com, pmorreale@...ell.com, sdietrich@...ell.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] RT - Track which CPUs should get IPI'd on rt-overload

The code currently blindly fires IPIs out whenever an overload occurs.
However, there are strict events that govern when a rt-overload exists
(e.g. RT task added to a RQ, or an RT task preempted).  Therefore, we
attempt to efficiently track which CPUs are eligible for rebalancing, and we
only IPI those affected units.

Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC: Peter W. Morreale <pmorreale@...ell.com>
---

 kernel/sched.c |   15 +++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index a28ca9d..6ca5f4f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -359,6 +359,8 @@ struct rq {
 	unsigned long rto_pulled;
 #endif
 	struct lock_class_key rq_lock_key;
+
+	cpumask_t rto_resched; /* Which of our peers needs rescheduling */
 };
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
@@ -645,6 +647,9 @@ static inline void inc_rt_tasks(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
 			smp_wmb();
 			atomic_inc(&rt_overload);
 		}
+
+		cpus_or(rq->rto_resched, rq->rto_resched, p->cpus_allowed);
+		cpu_clear(rq->cpu, rq->rto_resched);
 # endif
 	}
 #endif
@@ -2213,9 +2218,15 @@ static inline void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 	 * If we pushed an RT task off the runqueue,
 	 * then kick other CPUs, they might run it:
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(rt_task(current) && rq->rt_nr_running > 1)) {
+	if (unlikely(rt_task(current) && prev->se.on_rq && rt_task(prev))) {
+		cpus_or(rq->rto_resched, rq->rto_resched, prev->cpus_allowed);
+		cpu_clear(rq->cpu, rq->rto_resched);
+	}
+
+	if (unlikely(rq->rt_nr_running > 1 && !cpus_empty(rq->rto_resched))) {
 		schedstat_inc(rq, rto_schedule);
-		smp_send_reschedule_allbutself();
+		smp_send_reschedule_allbutself_cpumask(rq->rto_resched);
+		cpus_clear(rq->rto_resched);
 	}
 #endif
 	prev_state = prev->state;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/