linux-kernel - Re: [patch 08/12] NLM: Fix a circular lock dependency in lockd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071009151341.GA5925@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:13:41 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc:	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 08/12] NLM: Fix a circular lock dependency in lockd

On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 22:01 +0200, Roel Kluin wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > @@ -477,10 +479,15 @@ nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, 
> >  
> >  	if (block == NULL) {
> >  		struct file_lock *conf = kzalloc(sizeof(*conf), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		struct nlm_host	*host;
> >  
> >  		if (conf == NULL)
> >  			return nlm_granted;
> > -		block = nlmsvc_create_block(rqstp, file, lock, cookie);
> > +		/* Create host handle for callback */
> > +		host = nlmsvc_lookup_host(rqstp, lock->caller, lock->len);
> > +		if (host == NULL)
> > +			return nlm_lck_denied_nolocks;
> > +		block = nlmsvc_create_block(rqstp, host, file, lock, cookie);
> >  		if (block == NULL) {
> >  			kfree(conf);
> >  			return nlm_granted;
> > 
> > To be frankly I don't know what this is about, but shouldn't conf be freed if host == NULL?
> 
> Thanks for spotting this!
> 
> Greg, should I resend this patch, or would you prefer an incremental
> fix?

An incremental one would be best.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/