linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710081854370.28455@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
cc:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask

On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

> >  struct page * fastcall
> >  __alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> >  		struct zonelist *zonelist)
> >  {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Use a temporary nodemask for __GFP_THISNODE allocations. If the
> > +	 * cost of allocating on the stack or the stack usage becomes
> > +	 * noticable, allocate the nodemasks per node at boot or compile time
> > +	 */
> > +	if (unlikely(gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE)) {
> > +		nodemask_t nodemask;
> > +
> > +		return __alloc_pages_internal(gfp_mask, order,
> > +				zonelist, nodemask_thisnode(&nodemask));
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	return __alloc_pages_internal(gfp_mask, order, zonelist, NULL);
> >  }
> 
> <snip>
> 
> So alloc_pages_node() calls here and for THISNODE allocations, we go ask
> nodemask_thisnode() for a nodemask...

Hmmmm... nodemask_thisnode needs to be passed the zonelist.

> And nodemask_thisnode() always gives us a nodemask with only the node
> the current process is running on set, I think?

Right.

 
> That seems really wrong -- and would explain what Lee was seeing while
> using my patches for the hugetlb pool allocator to use THISNODE
> allocations. All the allocations would end up coming from whatever node
> the process happened to be running on. This obviously messes up hugetlb
> accounting, as I rely on THISNODE requests returning NULL if they go
> off-node.
> 
> I'm not sure how this would be fixed, as __alloc_pages() no longer has
> the nid to set in the mask.
> 
> Am I wrong in my analysis?

No you are right on target. The thisnode function must determine the node 
from the first zone of the zonelist.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/