[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071009164147.GB19854@plap3.qlogic.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:41:47 -0700
From: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
To: James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexis Bruemmer <alexisb@...ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...eleye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic94xx: Use request_firmware() to provide SAS address
if the adapter lacks one
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007, James Smart wrote:
> Why do you prefer request_firmware() vs something over sysfs ?
>
> Does environments like the kdump kernel also have access to data needed
> by request_firmware() ?
There's already much in the way of automation and infrastructure
present in supporting the request_firwmare() interfaces (perhaps not
the best of names) which can provide for a level of flexibility beyond
a basic 'soft_port_name' interface.
Though I don't see why both can't coexist cleanly -- I take it the use
case you are considering is: software recognizes no valid WWPN
available, query via request_firmware() fails, software halts
initialization (rather than fail), and awaits the admin to poke
'0x123456.. > /sys/.../fc_host/soft_port_name', causing a ping to the
driver and continuation of initialization with requested portname?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists