linux-kernel - Re: [ofa-general] Updated InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <470BB7ED.7070007@ichips.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:18:37 -0700
From:	Sean Hefty <mshefty@...ips.intel.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC:	Pradeep Satyanarayana <pradeeps@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Updated InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24

> Can you give a link to your current final version of the patch?
> 
> Sean, what's your opinion of where we stand?

Let me look back over the last version that was sent and reply back 
later today or tomorrow.  Several of my initial comments were on code 
structure.

> Since module parameters create a userspace-visible interface that we
> are stuck with for a long time, we definitely have to get at least
> that much right before merging.

I was taking a slightly different view of the design.  It would be nice 
to agree on whether SRQ should be separated from the QP type before 
merging upstream, even if the implementation doesn't immediately support 
all available options.

- Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/