| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071009182857.GF4003@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:28:57 -0400 From: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: gigabit ethernet power consumption On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:31:51PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote: > you most certainly want to do this in userspace I think. > > One of the biggest problems is that link negotiation can take a significant amount > of time, well over several seconds (1 to 3 seconds typical) with gigabit, and > having your ethernet connection go offline for 3 seconds may not be the desired > effect for when you want to get more bandwidth in the first place. > > However, when a laptop is in battery mode, switching down from gigabit to 100mbit > makes a lot more sense, so this is something I would recommend. This can be as > easy as changing the advertisement mask of the interface and renegotiating the > link. Userspace could handle that very easily. Now if you were trying to transfer a lot of data to the laptop, would it be more power efficient to do it at gigabit speeds so you can finish sooner and shut down the machine entirely, or to slow to 100mbit and take longer to do it, and hence spend more time powering the cpu and ram? -- Len Sorensen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists