[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071009041743.GA21552@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:17:43 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
Cc: kbuild devel <kbuild-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] kbuild: save ARCH & CROSS_COMPILE
>
> What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
> written to the .config?
Two issues to fix before we can do this:
1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt
2) We need to share much more Kconfig* between the individual architectures
First step is to let all arch's use drivers/Kconfig
Let's get the two items above solved then we can revisit adding arch selection
to kconfig (where it belongs in the end).
And neither require a rewrite of kconfig...
> Also, i'd like to propose sequencing of config-enable-build-this-unit
> in config file(s), thus Makefile(s) (sometimes very small and stupid)
> will be not necessary. Additional link ordering can be supplied as
> meta-config information there. Shell scripting, very ugly in the view
> of make syntax, will be natural in config files. Extending build
> process to get hidden dependencies or right linking/other magic is
> part of particular configuration. Hm?
Discussed before but so far no patches has shown up.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists