[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1191906701.6355.59.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:11:41 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: greg@...ah.com, david-b@...bell.net,
linux-usb-users@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OHCI root_port_reset() deadly loop...
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 21:47 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:39:09 -0700
>
> > No, nothing cute in udev itself, but it seems that all distros that I
> > know of have a "load these modules now" type setting in their init
> > scripts that can be used here.
> >
> > I can't think of a way to enforce this load order on the modules
> > themselves due to the fact that OHCI might not even be needed for EHCI
> > devices on UHCI (Intel) based chipsets :(
> >
> > Can anyone else?
>
> The three modules perhaps should be a bundle of whatever ones you have
> enabled, and internally we can dispatch the initialization to occur in
> the correct order from a top-level module_init().
>
> If the devices need to be initialized in a certain order in a
> situation like this, it really seems like it is the kernel's job to
> enforce it.
Is the problem strictly an ordering problem or just a race ? In the
later case, maybe some better arbitration by the USB core to make
sure things are quiescent or in a known state when letting a new HCD
register might help ?
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists