linux-kernel - Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071009112824.17d74610@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:28:24 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:30:54 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:43:10PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > + (e) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution are
> > +     public and that a record of the contribution (including my Reviewed-by
> > +     tag and any associated public communications) is maintained
> > +     indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with this project or
> > +     the open source license(s) involved.
> 
> Is this paragraph really necessary?  (For example, is there some history
> of problems that this is addressing?)

It was added between 1.0 and 1.1 to ensure that there were no awkward
interactions with various privacy and data protection laws by making sure
the submitter understands it is a public record and is contributing on
that basis.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/