lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071010130923.004ee895@the-village.bc.nu> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:09:23 +0100 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: wit <is01kzh@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: about probing a device On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:39:44 +0800 wit <is01kzh@...il.com> wrote: > Hi, > I found these routines in the kernel, does this means only one driver > can be matched to a device? What if two drivers both can drive the > device, like sd & sg in scsi subsystem? The first one which matches and successfully attaches "wins". Thus you can allow two drivers to match an identifier and load either one or the other. You can also deal with cases where the same identifier is used for two different devices (eg with the revision id distinguishing them), by having the probe methods fail if the revision is wrong. For things like sd/sg this isn't an issue. The hardware driver interfaces to the scsi layer which itself provides interfaces for sd, sr, sg, ... etc If you have a PCI device with multiple device functions on one PCI function it can be a problem. We have some special case drivers for serial/parallel multiport cards for exactly this reason, and some ugly hacks in AGP and EDAC that arise from this limit. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists