lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071010015807.GE22435@flower.upol.cz> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:58:08 +0200 From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 04:46:46PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:32:30 +0200, Oleg Verych said: > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:06:05PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > cpu_has() returns int, > > > > but would it be better to have something like > > > > > > > > if (!mce_disabled && > > > > !(c->x86_capability & (X86_FEATURE_MCA | X86_FEATURE_MCE)) { > > > > printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%i: No machine check support available\n", > > > > smp_processor_id()); > > > > > > This looks complicated and is harder to read. Its exactly the purpose of the > > > cpu_has() macro to avoid such constructs. > > > > It is done via test_bit(), which is designed for IO access with all that > > `const volatile' stuff, 2 x unnecessary, can't be optimized here (IMHO). > > If this code is getting called often enough that optimization matters, you > got *bigger* issues to worry about than optimization. Looks like it should > only happen once at boot time. Text size matters even on static storages. A Linuxbios image not fitting to the 2M flash, etc. Thanks. ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists