[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0710111046170.20114@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:49:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux RT Users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq
--
When I'm asked what language is my mother tongue,
I simply answer "C".
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, [UTF-8] Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> ---
> include/linux/spinlock.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.23-rc9-rt2/include/linux/spinlock.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc9-rt2.orig/include/linux/spinlock.h
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc9-rt2/include/linux/spinlock.h
> @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ do { \
>
> #define spin_trylock_irq(lock) \
> __cond_lock(lock, PICK_SPIN_OP_RET(__spin_trylock_irq, \
> - __spin_trylock_irq, lock))
> + _spin_trylock_irq, lock))
>
> #define spin_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> __cond_lock(lock, PICK_SPIN_OP_RET(__spin_trylock_irqsave, \
Thanks! Applied.
Daniel, this BUG was introduced by your conversion to PICK_FUNCTION patch.
Please be more careful, and do an audit of your patch. (I don't have time
ATM). This could also be the source of other bugs I've been chasing.
I might be pulling the PICK_FUNCTION patches if there's more bugs like
this.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists