linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fixup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200710111703.35129.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:03:34 +0200
From:	"Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@....com>
To:	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc:	"Joerg Roedel" <joerg.roedel@....com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce init optimization and signedness fixup

On Thursday 11 October 2007 16:55:36 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 October 2007 15:51:49 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > > MCG_CAP never reports a negative count of available error-reporting
> > > > banks. Therefore, make nr_mce_banks unsigned.
> > > > Check for MCA/MCE feature bits as early as possible.
> > > >
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCA) || !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCE)) {
> > > > +		printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%i: No machine check support available\n",
> > > > +			smp_processor_id());
> > > > +		return;
> > >
> > > This breaks winchip MCE support.
> >
> > First, what is a winchip? It sounds to be something windows specific. ;)
> > Second, can you explain in which way MCE support gets broken, please?
>
> First, winchip is the code name of Centaurs early x86 cpus.
>
> Second, those beasts do not have FEATURE_MCA, but they have FEATURE_MCE,
> so they support the fatal exception, but not the non fatal check.

So when I change the above code snippet to:

+	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MCE)) {
+		printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%i: No machine check support available\n",
+			smp_processor_id());
+		return;

Would this make the whole patch acceptable then?



-- 
AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany
Operating System Research Center

Legal Information:
AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Sitz (Geschäftsanschrift):
   Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Deutschland
Registergericht Dresden: HRA 4896
vertretungsberechtigter Komplementär:
   AMD Saxony LLC (Sitz Wilmington, Delaware, USA)
Geschäftsführer der AMD Saxony LLC:
   Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/