lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071011152609.GF22435@flower.upol.cz> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:26:09 +0200 From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>, "LKML (Cc removed)" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: coding for optimizations (Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change) On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:14:29AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: [] > It's also a quite ill idea to think about whether gcc might produce a > few bytes more or less code at the if when there's such a long printk() > in the middle... printk() problem was discussed with proper banana userspace replacement proposition by me, so i don't care much. Though, why MCE can't be enabled/disabled by config option? Native engineers from proper company should know what processors have this feature... If kconfig isn't flexible for this, i'm glad to hear opinions. If it's needed anyway, then sorry. ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists