linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] faster workaround

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:18:42 +0200
From:	Bernd Schubert <bs@...eap.de>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bernd Schubert <bs@...eap.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] faster workaround

On Thursday 11 October 2007 17:04:45 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 October 2007 16:19:37 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> 1) Just about the only valid optimization is to ensure that only the
> >> write path must be limited to small chunks, not both read- and
> >> write-paths.  Tejun had a patch to do this a long time ago, but it's an
> >> open question whether the large amount of code is worth it for a rare
> >> combination.
> >
> > How large? This patch is rather small? Where can I find it?
>
> http://home-tj.org/wiki/index.php/Sil_m15w

Thanks, I will take a look later on.

>
> > The problem came up, when 200GB drives were replaced by *newer* 250GB
> > drives (well maybe not the newest, no idea were they came from).
> >
> > Anyway, I'm testing for more than 24h already and didn't observe any data
> > corruption as without the patch. I know this is only an obersavation and
> > no definite prove...
> > Also, this is with 3114, maybe this chip behaves a bit different than
> > 3112?
>
> 3114 + new SATA drive is definitely a new one for us.
>
> It would help to (a) use the latest kernel, (b) post your .config with
> the latest kernel, (c) post lspci booted into latest kernel, and (d)
> post dmesg booted into latest kernel.

a) 2.6.23 + sil-patch I posted, this is on a customer system (though my former 
group), I wouldn't like to use -mm there.

b) .config is attached

c) attached

d) attached (don't get irritaded by those machine check events, thats "GART 
TLB errorr", harmless warnings, just not disabled in the bios).


Thanks,
Bernd

-- 
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH

View attachment "config-2.6.23" of type "text/plain" (34215 bytes)

View attachment "lspci.out" of type "text/plain" (6316 bytes)

Download attachment "dmesg.out.gz" of type "application/x-gzip" (7540 bytes)