linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make m68k cross compile like every other architecture.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:24:58 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make m68k cross compile like every other architecture.

> 
> > 2) suggested functionality makes it easy to do make headers_install
> 
> This is something completely different (cfr. the other thread handling
> it). If `make headers_install' doesn't need the cross compiler, it
> should not try to execute it.

This is obviously correct.
It happens that we execute gcc several times for just about any target
due to the:
CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, xxx)

And refactoring the top-level Makefile to avoid this is on my TODO list.
But it is a major crunch to do correct...

The primary objective to do so is btw not to solve this issue but
more to get the top-level Makefile off the top-10 list of the most
ureadable unmaitaninable unhackable code in the kernel.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/