lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710112255.57698.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:55:55 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Kevin <spaceman__spiff@....net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
	Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>, stable@...nel.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, BDFL <volkerdi@...ckware.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: ARPM shutdown oops (Re: [stable] [patch 09/12] Fix SMP poweroff hangs)

On Thursday, 11 October 2007 20:42, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
> >> The last kernel I used was 6.2.22 the "dmesg" the file is attached:
> >>
> >> dmesg 2.6.22 line 158 >  apm: overridden by ACPI.
> >>
> >> dmesg, APM on, has no line > apm: overridden by ACPI.
> > 
> > Ok, this is the real reason. 
> > 
> > The APM code does:
> > 
> >         if (PM_IS_ACTIVE()) {
> >                 printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: overridden by ACPI.\n");
> >                 apm_info.disabled = 1;
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >         }
> > 
> > and in previous kernels that would notice that you have ACPI enabled, and 
> > APM gets shut out, and you never see your buggy APM BIOS.
> > 
> > In 2.6.23, this apparently doesn't happen for some reason.
> > 
> > And I think I see the problem: it's a config change. You don't have 
> > PM_LEGACY enabled. Your config file diff shows:
> > 
> > 	-CONFIG_PM_LEGACY=y
> > 	+# CONFIG_PM_LEGACY is not set
> > 
> > I suspect we should make CONFIG_APM either depend on, or select, 
> > PM_LEGACY. But as far as I can see, nothing has actually changed in this 
> > area in the kernel, and this bug has been there before - just your config 
> > change made it appear. 
> > 
> > Rafael? Stephen? Opinions? I'd think that making APM depend on 
> > CONFIG_PM_LEGACY is the right thing to do these days..
> 
> Speaking as the author of
> 
> 	[PATCH] move pm_register/etc. to CONFIG_PM_LEGACY, pm_legacy.h
> 
> I agree.  arch/i386/kernel/apm.c clearly requires 
> include/linux/pm_legacy.h and the legacy PM API.
> 
> I would vote for a dependency rather than select, but don't have any 
> strong feelings on the matter...

I agree and yes, I'd vote for a dependency too.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ