[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710112255.57698.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:55:55 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kevin <spaceman__spiff@....net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>, stable@...nel.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, BDFL <volkerdi@...ckware.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: ARPM shutdown oops (Re: [stable] [patch 09/12] Fix SMP poweroff hangs)
On Thursday, 11 October 2007 20:42, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
> >> The last kernel I used was 6.2.22 the "dmesg" the file is attached:
> >>
> >> dmesg 2.6.22 line 158 > apm: overridden by ACPI.
> >>
> >> dmesg, APM on, has no line > apm: overridden by ACPI.
> >
> > Ok, this is the real reason.
> >
> > The APM code does:
> >
> > if (PM_IS_ACTIVE()) {
> > printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: overridden by ACPI.\n");
> > apm_info.disabled = 1;
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > and in previous kernels that would notice that you have ACPI enabled, and
> > APM gets shut out, and you never see your buggy APM BIOS.
> >
> > In 2.6.23, this apparently doesn't happen for some reason.
> >
> > And I think I see the problem: it's a config change. You don't have
> > PM_LEGACY enabled. Your config file diff shows:
> >
> > -CONFIG_PM_LEGACY=y
> > +# CONFIG_PM_LEGACY is not set
> >
> > I suspect we should make CONFIG_APM either depend on, or select,
> > PM_LEGACY. But as far as I can see, nothing has actually changed in this
> > area in the kernel, and this bug has been there before - just your config
> > change made it appear.
> >
> > Rafael? Stephen? Opinions? I'd think that making APM depend on
> > CONFIG_PM_LEGACY is the right thing to do these days..
>
> Speaking as the author of
>
> [PATCH] move pm_register/etc. to CONFIG_PM_LEGACY, pm_legacy.h
>
> I agree. arch/i386/kernel/apm.c clearly requires
> include/linux/pm_legacy.h and the legacy PM API.
>
> I would vote for a dependency rather than select, but don't have any
> strong feelings on the matter...
I agree and yes, I'd vote for a dependency too.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists