[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710111123560.20620@jikos.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:27:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> And on s390
> In file included from arch/s390/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c:202:
> arch/s390/kernel/../../../fs/binfmt_elf.c: In function 'load_elf_binary':
> arch/s390/kernel/../../../fs/binfmt_elf.c:1088: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_randomize_brk'
This should be fixed trivially in the very same way as for x86_64, i.e.
something like
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c b/arch/s390/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c
index f1e40ca..4b5432d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c
@@ -199,5 +199,6 @@ cputime_to_compat_timeval(const cputime_t cputime, struct compat_timeval *value)
value->tv_sec = cputime / 1000000;
}
+extern void arch_randomize_brk(void);
#include "../../../fs/binfmt_elf.c"
right? Maybe this would be needed for other architectures too :( I will
check this. I'd really like the patch go in, so that we have really full
randomization finally.
> I'll drop the patch. Really we should fix the elf mess before we try and
> change it any more.
I agree that it is a total mess. We'd need someone brave enough to rewrite
this crap :/
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists