linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710111905420.6887@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild updates

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> 
> This set of commits are the kbuild stuff that does not
> conflict with the pending x86 merge.

Hmm. It does for me, actually.

I fixed up the trivial conflict in the main Makefile, but that seems to 
leave $(ARCH) entirely undefined in my case, so the end result doesn't 
work. That seems to have nothing to do with my conflict fixup, but is 
something else.

It also gets a trivial conflict with the 'mmc' pull I just did, but that 
didn't seem problematic (mmc added a new case to scripts/mod/file2alias.c, 
and you added a free, both at the end of the same function) - but the x86 
merge conflict means that I decided that I'll let you sort it out. It's 
probably really trivial, but I'll merge the other stuff I have pending 
instead.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/