lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:21:06 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	jeff@...zik.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git for-linus

 > > This will get the batch of changes queued up for the 2.6.24 merge
 > > window (although I still have a few more things to merge later, once
 > > Dave Miller's networking tree has landed too):
 > 
 > Roland are you absolutely sure this won't create merge conflicts with
 > my 8MB net-2.6 merge, inside of which there are many infiniband
 > driver changes?

I'm not absolutely sure of anything but I have merged our two git
trees quite a few times during the 2.6.23 cycle and I have not seen
any conflicts.  Unless you've added some more IB changes very recently
I don't think there should be any problem.

 > I really wish you would submit your inifiniband work through normal
 > network driver channels, such as Jeff Garzik.  Jeff has been syncing
 > on almost a daily basis with me so that I wouldn't have to worry about
 > changes coming out of left field and adding additional merge issues
 > for an already difficult merge.

I'm not sure what you mean.  During the 2.6.23 cycle I've been sending
any patches that potentially could conflict with the net-2.6 tree to
you and Jeff so that you can merge them upstream via your tree.  Or do
you mean Jeff should become the maintainer of drivers/infiniband??

Can't you guys just keep the networking stuff contained in its little
box so it doesn't create maintenance problems for InfiniBand stuff?

 > Even if you're confident there won't be merge issues, could you just
 > wait for the net-2.6 stuff to go in first?

I don't mind waiting but I guess it's up to Linus really.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ