[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <470F7B4B.2010609@trash.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:48:59 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Oct 12 2007 16:30, Al Boldi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>With the existence of the mangle table, how useful is the filter table?
>>>
>>>A similar discussion was back in March 2007.
>>>http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=117394977210823&w=2
>>>http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=117400063907706&w=2
>>>
>>>in the end, my proposal was something like
>>>http://jengelh.hopto.org/GFX0/nf_proposal2.svg
>>
>>Any chance you could publish this as something readable like text/html?
>
>
> Like, image/png?
> http://jengelh.hopto.org/GFX0/nf_proposal2.png
The netlink based iptables successor I'm currently working on allows to
dynamically create tables with user-specified priorities and "built-in"
chains. The only built-in tables will be those that need extra
processing (mangle/nat). So it should be possible to set up tables
basically any way you desire.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists