lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071012164424.GA7709@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date:	Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:44:24 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix wait_for_completion_interruptible declaration mismatch

Without the fastcall, I get a declaration mismatch between the
definition here and the declaration in completion.h.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@...ux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.22/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/kernel/sched.c	2007-10-12 12:23:57.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.22/kernel/sched.c	2007-10-12 12:36:39.000000000 -0400
@@ -3789,7 +3789,7 @@ wait_for_completion_timeout(struct compl
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_for_completion_timeout);
 
-int __sched wait_for_completion_interruptible(struct completion *x)
+int fastcall __sched wait_for_completion_interruptible(struct completion *x)
 {
 	return wait_for_common(x, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ