[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071012174507.GA21193@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:45:07 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@...il.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:50:01PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> We currently have infrastructure for discardable text and data, but no
> such thing for strings. This is especially notable for inline strings
> such as ones used by printk() which are left behind resident in the memory
> throughout the life of the system even though code referring to them has
> been removed.
What is the actual benefit here expressed in real numbers?
For the __init/__exit notation that is yet only partially correct
we often see corner cases where one ask if it is really worth it.
Adding the discard functionality for strings seems like a logical extension
but there is a benefit/pain ratio to consider.
So real numbers please.
A few general notes to the patch.
1) We want to consolidate this in include/asm-generic/vmlinux*
somehow and this should be doen as a separate step.
2) If we introduce discardable strings then we shall in parallel
add build time checks so we catch strings marked as discardable
which is used outside a discardable compatible function.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists