[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071013114549.GA10875@gollum.tnic>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:45:50 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@...oo.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.sg>
Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 01:52:52AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:44:55 +0200 Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@...oo.de> wrote:
>
> > can you please add http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/30/98 also to the misc-queue for
> > the warning still persists and the patch is good to go as is (against current git
> > v2.6.23-2840-g752097c, for example) albeit with a little fuzziness.
>
> I got completely fed up with maintaining that patch against ongoing churn
> frenzy in Greg's trees so I dropped it.
>
> If/when things settle down in that area someone will need to redo the
> patch.
/me wondering: what if you pass it on upstream to Linus, since:
1. it applies cleanly now
2. is pretty trivial
and forget it about it forever :). It seems the place this
patch touches is the only place where kobject_* and sysfs_create_* etc. error
codes are not being handled in contrast to all those functions which have been declared
__must_check?
--
Regards/Gruß,
Boris.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists