[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1192265717.27435.44.camel@twins>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:55:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 09:18 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:51 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Subject: sched: high-res preemption tick
> >
> > Use HR-timers (when available) to deliver an accurate preemption tick.
>
> This patch further reduced iperf context switching, and boosted
> throughput.
>
> iperf -c localhost -P 10 -t 300
>
> Previously reported numbers
>
> 2.6.23-smp
> [SUM] 0.0-300.0 sec 153 GBytes 4.39 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-300.1 sec 148 GBytes 4.23 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-300.0 sec 152 GBytes 4.36 Gbits/sec
>
> 2.6.23-smp-d (sched-devel)
> [SUM] 0.0-300.0 sec 173 GBytes 4.96 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-300.1 sec 173 GBytes 4.96 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-300.0 sec 172 GBytes 4.93 Gbits/sec
>
> Numbers from fresh pull today
>
> 2.6.23-smp-d-hrt
> (re-enable PREEMPT_RESTRICT)
Ah, but HRTICK is not compatible with PREEMPT_RESTRICT, it will be
similar to !WAKEUP_PREEMPT.
> [SUM] 0.0-300.1 sec 181 GBytes 5.19 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-300.0 sec 182 GBytes 5.22 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-300.1 sec 182 GBytes 5.22 Gbits/sec
>
> 2.6.23-smp-d
> [SUM] 0.0-300.1 sec 174 GBytes 4.97 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-300.1 sec 173 GBytes 4.95 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-300.1 sec 173 GBytes 4.96 Gbits/sec
>
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists