[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1192404972.7014.0.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:36:12 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com>,
nedev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: MSI interrupts and disable_irq
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 16:15 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 09:15 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > > Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > > On 10/13/07, Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Someone around with a MSI capable board? The forcedeth driver does
> > > >> dev->irq = pci_dev->irq
> > > >> in nv_probe(), especially before pci_enable_msi().
> > > >> Does pci_enable_msi() change pci_dev->irq? Then we would disable the
> > > >> wrong interrupt....
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > the request_irq==>setup_irq will make dev->irq = pci_dev->irq.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Where is that?
> > > Otherwise I would propose the attached patch. My board is not
> > > MSI-capable, thus I can't test it myself.
> >
> > Why not just copy pcidev->irq to dev->irq once ?
>
> it seems e1000 is using np->pci_dev->irq directly too.
Heh, allright, doesn't matter, I was just proposing to avoid one more
indirection :-)
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists