linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.24 PATCH 02/25] dm io:ctl use constant struct size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071015012621.GD10006@agk.fab.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:26:21 +0100
From:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>,
	Guido Guenther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
	Kevin Corry <kevcorry@...ibm.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 PATCH 02/25] dm io:ctl use constant struct size

On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:16:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This change seems rather bogus, you're changing the ABI just to work
> around a bug in the compat_ioctl layer. Why not just do the compat
> code the right way, like the patch below?

The underlying ABI is not changing, I hope - the trailing padding in the
struct should not affect the processing of the data by dm, and I see no
reason to continue maintaining the fiction that the 32-bit and 64-bit
ioctls are in some way incompatible with each other when they aren't
AFAIK.

And yes, a follow-up patch can clean up our use of the compatibility
mechanism, going a little bit further than the patch you attached, I
hope.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@...hat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/