[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1192467237.10277.33.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-04>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:53:57 +0200
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>
To: Philippe Elie <phil.el@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WANTED: kernel projects for CS students
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 18:36 +0200, Philippe Elie wrote:
> > > Increase speed for a build with no updates
> > > ==========================================
> > > On a resonably fast machine with a decent config it takes
> > > roughly 10 seconds to do a make where nothing is updated.
> > > Generating one single Makefile is assumed to speed up things
> > > and will in addition allow a simpler syntax as what is used today
> > > for some of the uglier constructs.
> > >
> > > Contact: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> > > Difficulty: 5
> > > Language: Perl or C
> >
> > Isn't make -j 2 or more implemented by running multiple make in sub-dirs ?
> > Parallel make is more and more used even on cheap hardware.
>
> Errm, I misread what you said, it can be a single Makefile in each sub-dirs
make -j works fine with an unique Makefile, if that's the question.
Xav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists