[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071015041133.GH995458@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:11:33 +1000
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
xfs@....sgi.com, Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@...cam.ac.uk>,
Morten Bøgeskov <xen-users@...ten.bogeskov.dk>,
xfs-masters@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 08:42:34PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> > That's not going to
> > happen for at least a cycle or two though, so in the meantime maybe
> > an ifdef for that XFS vmap batching code would help?
> >
>
> For now I've proposed a patch to simply eagerly vunmap everything when
> CONFIG_XEN is set. It certainly works, but I don't have a good feel for
> how much of a performance hit that imposes on XFS.
With defaults - little effect as vmap should never be used. It's
only when you start using larger block sizes for metadata that this
becomes an issue. The CONFIG_XEN workaround should be fine until we
get a proper vmap cache....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists