linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ipv4: kernel panic when only one unsecured port available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071015.130614.129757419.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	aarapov@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...hat.com, jgarzik@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: kernel panic when only one unsecured port
 available

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:49:19 -0700

> This code has recently been reworked, but from my reading, that
> divide-by-zero can still occur.  And given that the numbers in
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range are inclusive, the arithmetic in
> inet_csk_get_port() seems to just be wrong?
> 
> So we have this, against David's current devel tree:

I'm pretty sure we took care of this, but maybe not :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/