linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:56:57 +0200
From:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty

Am Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2007 schrieb Eric W. Biederman:

> fs/buffer.c |    3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  drivers/block/rd.c |   13 +------------
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Your patches look sane so far. I have applied both patches, and the problem 
seems gone. I will try to get these patches to our testers.

As long as they dont find new problems:

Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>

Nick, Eric. What is the best patch for the stable series? Both patches from
Eric or mine? I CCed stable, so they know that something is coming.

Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/