[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071016112859.1b0fba0e@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:28:59 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <piggin@...erone.com.au>
Subject: Re: OOM killer gripe (was Re: What still uses the block layer?)
> I'm sure somebody will eventually write an OLS paper or something on the
> advisability of making swapping decisions with 4k granularity when disks
> really want bigger I/O transactions.
Funnily enough someone thought of that many years ago. They even added
and documented it, then they made it adjustable.
See the vm section of Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists