lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:55:54 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
cc:	bbpetkov@...oo.de,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	USB development list <linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb+sysfs: duplicate filename 'bInterfaceNumber'

On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Dave Young wrote:

> > I finally duplicated this on one of my machines here at boot time, with
> > USB built into the kernel.  I'll work tomorrow on tracking this down
> > further...
> Hi,
> I add some printk messages, dump_stack and some others, here is the
> dmesg dump with debug info(lines begin with "hidave"):

Okay, good, the extra printk messages show exactly where the problem 
lies.

In usb_set_configuration(), each new interfaces is registered and then
usb_create_sysfs_intf_files() gets called for that interface.  This
makes sense, because obviously we can't create sysfs files for an
interface before it is registered.

The problem is that during registration drivers get probed, and drivers 
sometimes call usb_set_interface() from their probe method.  This 
routine also calls usb_create_sysfs_intf_files(), and the result is 
that the sysfs files get created twice:

	First by usb_set_interface, from the driver probe;

	Then by usb_set_configuration, when registration is
	finished.

I can think of two possible ways around the problem.  One is to add a 
bit to the usb_interface structure, recording whether the sysfs files 
have been created.  The other is always to remove the files just before 
trying to create them.

The first seems more workable, although it is slightly awkward.  Greg, 
what do you think?

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ