linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/3] Introduce BOOTMEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1192558097.17464.15.camel@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:08:16 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To:	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] Introduce BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 18:28 +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> 
> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int __init smp_scan_config (unsig
>                         smp_found_config = 1;
>                         printk(KERN_INFO "found SMP MP-table at %08lx\n",
>                                                 virt_to_phys(mpf));
> -                       reserve_bootmem(virt_to_phys(mpf), PAGE_SIZE);
> +                       reserve_bootmem(virt_to_phys(mpf), PAGE_SIZE, 0);
>                         if (mpf->mpf_physptr) {
>                                 /* 

Could you give all of these 0's a name?  I really hate seeing random
magic numbers in these things.  0 completely kills the ability of
someone to read the code and figure out what it is trying to do without
going and looking at reserve_bootmem().

Or, alternatively, do something like this:

-extern void reserve_bootmem(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
+/*
+ * If flags is 0, then the return value is always 0 (success). If
+ * flags contains BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE, then -EBUSY is returned if the
+ * memory already was reserved.
+ */
+extern int reserve_bootmem(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, int flag);
+int reserve_bootmem(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	/* the 0 is because we don't
+	return reserve_bootmem_exclusive(addr, size, 0);
+}

Where all of the existing callers stay the same.  But, the ones wanting
exclusive access actually call the _exclusive() variant.  

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/