linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.23-mm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071016233126.GA23784@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:31:26 -0700
From:	Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-mm1

On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:28:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:58, Mark Gross wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:40:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, 15 October 2007 18:09, Mark Gross wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:32:40PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, 12 October 2007 06:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23/2.6.23-mm1/
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > - I've been largely avoiding applying anything since rc8-mm2 in an attempt
> > > > > >   to stabilise things for the 2.6.23 merge.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >   But that didn't stop all the subsystem maintainers from going nuts, with
> > > > > >   the usual accuracy.  We're up to a 37MB diff now, but it seems to be working
> > > > > >   a bit better.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I get many traces similar to the one below from it (w/ hotfixes):
> > > > > 
> > > > > WARNING: at /home/rafael/src/mm/linux-2.6.23-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c:397 smp_call_function_mask()
> > > > 
> > > > This is from : WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()) in the cmp_call_function_mask
> > > > processor_idle.c is registering a acpi_processor_latency_notify 
> > > > 
> > > > my code changed the notifier call from blocking_notifier_call_chain to
> > > > srcu_notifier_call_chain, because dynamic creation of notifier chains at
> > > > runtime where easier with the srcu_notifier_call_chain than the
> > > > blocking_notifier_call_chain.  
> > > > 
> > > > As dynamic creation of PM_QOS parameters are no longer needed I can
> > > > change the notifiers back to match what was in lanency.c
> > > > 
> > > > However; looking at the call tree differences between
> > > > blockin_notifier_call_chain and srcu_notifier_call_chain I cannot see a
> > > > difference in irq enabling / disabling.  I'm not confident this will
> > > > address this yet.
> > > 
> > > Well, you can send me a patch to check. :-)
> > 
> > I think I'll have to send you a patch that changes the notifiers but I
> > doubt it will fix it.  
> > 
> > After a bit of messing around I have the 2.6.23-mm1 running on my core-2
> > box  note: Ubuntu's make-kpkg on the mm1 tree resulted in a system that
> > wouldn't boot past the intrd.  Looks like the pivot root failed or
> > something.
> > 
> > Anyway, I'm not reproducing your experience, snd_pcm is loaded.  I don't
> > know none of the WARN's are not hitting on my box.
> > 
> > do you have some configuration information that could help me reproduce
> > the issue?
> 
> Well, I can send you the .config, but the box is AMD-based (Turion 64 X2),
> with an ATI chipset and an HP BIOS, so it seems to be much different from
> yours.

it may be worth a shot anyway.  

BTW while changing my code to use the blocking notifiers I found that
there is a initialization race between cpu-idle and pm_qos I have to
fix.

I need to re factor my start up code to handle cpuidle registering
itself in as a notifier at core_initcall time.

I'll have a patch ready tomorrow.

thanks,

--mgross
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/