lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710160014.15653.rob@landley.net>
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:14:15 -0500
From:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>, zippel@...ux-m68k.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow kconfig to accept overrides

On Monday 15 October 2007 11:29:58 pm Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Rob & Jan.
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:44:08PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > Allow config variables in .config to override earlier ones in the same
> > file. In other words,
> >
> > 	# CONFIG_SECURITY is not defined
> > 	CONFIG_SECURITY=y
> >
> > will activate it. This makes it a bit easier to do
> >
> > 	(cat original-config myconfig myconfig2 ... >.config)
> >
> > and run menuconfig as expected.
>
> How far is this from the miniconfig functionality?
> Is it the same or can we achieve the miniconfig support
> by extending Jan's patch?
>
> See: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/12/391

Way way back (2.6.10 or thereabouts) I first did a miniconfig via running 
allnoconfig, concatenating a miniconfig to the result, and running "make 
oldconfig" on that.  This concatenation method had two main problems:

1) Around 2.6.15 the kconfig infrastructure changed so the first instance 
symbol won rather than the last symbol.  It looks like this patch just sets 
the behavior back to what we had in 2.6.14 and earlier.

2) When a symbol activates new subsymbols (opening a new menu, for example), 
those dependant symbols would be activated at their oldconfig default values, 
not their allnoconfig default values.  This meant there might be a valid 
configuration that you couldn't specify without saying "symbol=n" to turn 
some of them off in your miniconfig, which is something a miniconfig should 
never have to do.  (This happens when allnoconfig and oldconfig are run in 
two separate passes.  The oldconfig pass uses the wrong default values for 
newly enabled symbols.  Menuconfig has the same defaults as oldconfig, which 
are _not_ the same defaults as allnoconfig.)

Note that the infrastructure I'm using to _read_ miniconfig files is just a 
repurpose of the existing KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG as applied to allnoconfig.  
That's in kconfig already, has been since 2.6.15-ish, and works fine.  The 
syntax is nonobvious (two patches from me to improve said syntax and add some 
error checking were rejected), but the functionality is there and easy enough 
to trigger:

  make allnoconfig KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=mini.conf

That expands a mini.conf into a .config, and does the other setup necessary.  
(You can feed that O= to build out of tree, or ARCH= to build another 
architecture...  Anything you can currently do with allnoconfig.)

It's the "shrinking a .config into a mini.conf" side of things that uses a 
hideous shell script that's not in the tree:
http://landley.net/hg/firmware/raw-file/tip/sources/toys/miniconfig.sh

To use it:
  make ARCH=arm defconfig
  mv .config tempname
  ARCH=arm ./miniconfig.sh tempname
  ls -l mini.config

(Obviously, the ARCH=arm is optional and you don't have to start with 
defconfig.)

If I had unlimited spare time I might teach kconfig to automatically write a 
mini.conf every time it writes a .config, and have it use whichever was newer 
in the update commands (oldconfig/menuconfig/etc).  But after two rejected 
patches on this topic already, with the shell script meeting my needs, that's 
impressively far down on my todo list.

Rob
-- 
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ