[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071017072003.GA18044@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:20:03 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix improper load balance across sched domain
* Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com> wrote:
> We recently discovered a nasty performance bug in the kernel CPU load
> balancer where we were hit by 50% performance regression.
>
> When tasks are assigned to a subset of CPUs that span across
> sched_domains (either ccNUMA node or the new multi-core domain) via
> cpu affinity, kernel fails to perform proper load balance at these
> domains, due to several logic in find_busiest_group() miss identified
> busiest sched group within a given domain. This leads to inadequate
> load balance and causes 50% performance hit.
[...]
> So proposing the following fix: add addition logic in
> find_busiest_group to detect intrinsic imbalance within the busiest
> group. When such condition is detected, load balance goes into spread
> mode instead of default grouping mode.
thanks - i've added your fix to the scheduler queue, and i'll check it
with a few workloads too. (Right now the scheduler queue is blocked by a
showstopper crasher bug in group scheduling and we are trying to fix
that first, before doing any other change.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists