linux-kernel - Re: [RT] seqlocks: use of PICK_FUNCTION breaks kernel compile when CONFIG_GENERIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:24:05 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Remy Bohmer <linux@...mer.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RT] seqlocks: use of PICK_FUNCTION breaks kernel compile when
	CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME is NOT set

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 11:10 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> > >  
> > >  #define read_seqbegin_irqsave(lock, flags)			\
> > > -do {								\
> > > +({								\
> > >  	flags = PICK_SEQ_OP_RET(__read_seqbegin_irqsave_raw,	\
> > >  		__read_seqbegin_irqsave, lock);			\
> > > -} while (0)
> > > +	read_seqbegin(lock);					\
> > > +})
> 
> Yes, definitely the raw and unraw functions should be called
> local_irqsave_raw or something else that makes this obvious to what it
> is doing.

Hmm.. I'm not sure what else to name them .. Since it's in the seqlock.h
I don't think it should be called anything "local_irq*" .. It could be
seq_irqsave_{raw} . 

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/