lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710171053180.26902@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bug] block subsystem related crash with latest -git



On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> OK, it is fine, as long as the sglist is cleared initially. And I don't
> think there's anyway around that, clearly I didn't think long enough
> before including the memset() removal from Tomo.

Ok, I think that one-liner fixes the real bug.

But I think the rest of your changes are simply bad.

The fix to block/ll_rw_block.c should likely be something like the 
appended instead:

 - remove the "memset()" you had added earlier. It's bogus. It cannot be 
   the right thing. If the sg list wasn't initialized correctly much 
   earlier, trying to initialize it late is pointless - it contains crap.

 - the old code was fine, but let's initialize "sg" to NULL to make it 
   clear that the initial value of sg is pointless, and only "next_sg" 
   matters (since sg had better be assigned from that).

Hmm?

		Linus

---
diff --git a/block/ll_rw_blk.c b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
index 9e3f3cc..54d974e 100644
--- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c
+++ b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
@@ -1333,7 +1333,8 @@ int blk_rq_map_sg(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
 	 * for each bio in rq
 	 */
 	bvprv = NULL;
-	sg = next_sg = &sglist[0];
+	sg = NULL;
+	next_sg = &sglist[0];
 	rq_for_each_segment(bvec, rq, iter) {
 		int nbytes = bvec->bv_len;
 
@@ -1352,7 +1353,6 @@ new_segment:
 			sg = next_sg;
 			next_sg = sg_next(sg);
 
-			memset(sg, 0, sizeof(*sg));
 			sg->page = bvec->bv_page;
 			sg->length = nbytes;
 			sg->offset = bvec->bv_offset;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ