[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071017184049.GV15552@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:40:49 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bug] block subsystem related crash with latest -git
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > So I think your change to use "sg_next()" only when you actually need a
> > next pointer is the correct one after all.
>
> That still leaves the initialization issue. The link pointers need to all
> be initialized at SG allocation time (and not just the last one for the
> case where it's a linked entry).
>
> And if you initialize them at allocation time, does an allocation ever get
> re-used without being free'd in between (if it does, you do indeed need to
> initialize the non-link pointers each time - but I don't see it being the
> case, so ..)
The links will not change, so reuse should actually be OK. The reuse
cannot be larger than the original would hold, but that would be a bug
without chaining as well of course.
WRT reuse, if we end up requeuing a request, than we will go through the
whole thing again. I don't think Ingo is hitting that either, though.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists