[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071017191456.GA14916@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:14:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git
* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > btw., i get the following build warning:
> >
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c: In function 'scsi_free_sgtable':
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:708: warning: 'index' may be used uninitialized in this function
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:708: note: 'index' was declared here
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:708: warning: 'index' may be used uninitialized in this function
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:708: note: 'index' was declared here
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c: In function 'scsi_alloc_sgtable':
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:708: warning: 'index' may be used uninitialized in this function
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:708: note: 'index' was declared here
> >
> > not sure it matters.
>
> Hmm, I don't see them here (gcc 4.2.1). Must be the BUG(), does it go
> away if you add a index = -1 in the default: case? Just to be
> absolutely sure...
well if i initialize the variable then of course the warning goes away
:)
NOTE: i get the same warning even without the BUG_ON() patch, and
without your other fix patch as well. I'm using gcc 4.2.2. (Do you get
the warning if you pick up the config i sent you earlier today?)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists