[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <471699A0.3060303@tmr.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:24:16 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
CC: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>>> If not, then shouldn't the filter table be obsoleted to avoid
>>>> confusion?
>>> That would probably confuse people. Just don't use it if you don't
>>> need to.
>>
> That is a most practical suggestion.
>
>> The problem is that people think they are safe with the filter table,
>> when in fact they need the prerouting chain to seal things. Right now
>> this is only possible in the mangle table.
>>
> I'm not sure what you think is unsafe about using the filter table, and
> the order of evaluation issues certainly seem to suggest that some
> actions would take a major rethink at least. Perhaps you could avoid
> breaking all of the setups which currently work, rather than force
> everyone to do things differently because you feel that your way is better.
>
It was my intention to suggest that unintentional breakage of existing
setups should be avoided, not that removing the filter table was some
evil plot. ;-)
On rereading my original post I failed to make that clear, please take
it as intended.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists