[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071017030149.GC3397@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:01:49 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Distinguishing releases from pre-rc snapshots
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:45:17PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 22:34 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:22:43PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >
> > > It would be nice to establish a rule to increment the version number
> > > immediately after the kernel release and have a suffix to indicate that
> > > it's a pre-rc version. "rc0" is my personal favorite.
> >
> > fwiw, rc0 is also what the Fedora kernel uses for versioning when we're
> > shipping pre-rc1 kernels.
>
> Thanks! I didn't think of the possibility of anyone distributing
> precompiled kernels from the "pre-rc" window, but if Fedora does it
> (hopefully for beta-testers only), it should be absolutely clear that
> it's not just a release with some minor fixes.
yeah, this is just in our 'development' pool (also known as 'rawhide')
Proper releases only ever get full point releases + -stable as updates.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists