lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071017041752.GA9940@in.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:47:52 +0530 From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>, Rusty Russel <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Refcount Based Cpu-Hotplug Revisit. On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:23:38PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Dipankar Sarma wrote: > > > > Unless I am reading the patch wrongly, it seems cpu_hotplug_begin() is called > > while holding the cpu_add_remove_lock mutex. So, another CPU cannot come in > > and do the same until _cpu_down() is over. > > Ahh, in that case I take back that objection, although maybe a comment > about the required nesting within the other mutex is in order? Or maybe > it's there and I just missed it (blush). Good point! I'll add the comment before cpu_hotplug_begin(). > > Linus Thanks and Regards gautham. -- Gautham R Shenoy Linux Technology Center IBM India. "Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain, because Freedom is priceless!" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists