[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071017041752.GA9940@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:47:52 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Rusty Russel <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Refcount Based Cpu-Hotplug Revisit.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:23:38PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> >
> > Unless I am reading the patch wrongly, it seems cpu_hotplug_begin() is called
> > while holding the cpu_add_remove_lock mutex. So, another CPU cannot come in
> > and do the same until _cpu_down() is over.
>
> Ahh, in that case I take back that objection, although maybe a comment
> about the required nesting within the other mutex is in order? Or maybe
> it's there and I just missed it (blush).
Good point! I'll add the comment before cpu_hotplug_begin().
>
> Linus
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists