linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch] fallback to "no irq" hack for case of no pnp_irq allocated for 8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071017044003.GC16728@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:40:03 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] fallback to "no irq" hack for case of no pnp_irq allocated for 8250_pnp

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:50:53AM +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> There is a "ttyS1 irq is -1" problem observed on tiger4 which cause
> the serial port broken.
> It is because that there is __no__ ACPI IRQ resource assigned for the
> serial port. So the value of the IRQ for the port is never changed
> since it got initialized to -1. The attached patch falls back to the
> "no irq" hack for this case. It works for me. Please review and test.

Seems reasonable to me.  Although arguably pnp_irq is broken, since
Linus has decreed that 0 means no irq on Linux.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/