[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <47159AA3.10305@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:16:19 +0900
From: "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" <oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>,
Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org>,
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>,
kexec-ml <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [kexec-tools] Pass vmcoreinfo's address and size
Hi Simon,
Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:13:39PM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>> [2/3] [kexec-tools] Pass vmcoreinfo's address and size
>> The patch is for kexec-tools-testing-20070330.
>> (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/horms/kexec-tools/)
>> kexec command gets the address and size of the vmcoreinfo data from
>> /sys/kernel/vmcoreinfo, and passes them to the second kernel through
>> ELF header of /proc/vmcore. When the second kernel is booting, the
>> kernel gets them from the ELF header and creates vmcoreinfo's PT_NOTE
>> segment into /proc/vmcore.
>
> Sorry for the long delay, I completely missed this patch.
>
> The kexec-tools change seems ok to me. What is the status of
> the kernel portion of the change?
The kernel portion is merged into linux-2.6.23-mm1.
According to Andrew's mail "-mm merge plans for 2.6.24", its status is
"The infamous misc. Will re-review and will merge basically all of them".
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.0/0313.html
> Do you still want the kexec-tools portion applied?
Yes, I hope so.
Thanks
Ken'ichi Ohmichi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists