[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BAE9DCEF64577A439B3A37F36F9B691C033FE9A3@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:46:30 -0700
From: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@...el.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5] I/OAT: Add completion callback for async_tx interface use
>From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
>
>On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:14:39 -0700
>Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com> wrote:
[...]
>> +static dma_async_tx_callback ioat_dma_test_callback(void
>*dma_async_param)
>> +{
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "ioatdma: ioat_dma_test_callback(0x%04llx)\n",
>> + (u64)dma_async_param);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
>This wanted to be `return NULL'. I'll fix.
Thanks.
>
>> /**
>> * ioat_dma_self_test - Perform a IOAT transaction to
>verify the HW works.
>> * @device: device to be tested
>> @@ -691,6 +715,8 @@ static int ioat_dma_self_test(struct
>ioatdma_device *device)
>> addr = dma_map_single(dma_chan->device->dev, dest,
>IOAT_TEST_SIZE,
>> DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> ioat_set_dest(addr, tx, 0);
>> + tx->callback = (void *)ioat_dma_test_callback;
>
>This cast is unneeded, surely? It had better be..
>
>> + tx->callback_param = (void *)0x8086;
>
>eh?
I suppose I could have used "42"...
sln
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists