[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47176483.8030103@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:49:55 +0200
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, tomof@....org
Subject: Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git
On Oct. 18, 2007, 15:32 +0200, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> static inline struct scatterlist *sg_next(struct scatterlist *sg)
> {
> - sg++;
> -
> - if (unlikely(sg_is_chain(sg)))
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SG
> + BUG_ON(sg->sg_magic != SG_MAGIC);
> +#endif
> + if (sg_is_last(sg))
> + sg = NULL;
> + else if (sg_is_chain(sg))
> sg = sg_chain_ptr(sg);
> + else
> + sg++;
>
Jens, again, please correct me if I'm wrong, but when sg points at the
entry right before a chain entry this implementation of sg_next will
return a pointer to the chain entry here, which I believe it must not.
> return sg;
> }
>
here's how I think sg_next should be implemented:
*/
static inline struct scatterlist *sg_next(struct scatterlist *sg)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SG
+ BUG_ON(sg->sg_magic != SG_MAGIC);
+#endif
+ if (sg_is_last(sg))
+ return NULL;
+
sg++;
if (unlikely(sg_is_chain(sg)))
sg = sg_chain_ptr(sg);
return sg;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists